There was a time when American persuasion aspired to logic, or at least the shadow of it. We debated policy. We invoked facts. We believed that if we could just explain enough — taxes, welfare, war, budgets — others would see the light.
That era is gone.
Today, absurdity is not the fringe. It is the fuel. If you wish to persuade Americans, do not bore them with credible statistics or careful nuance; simply say something outrageous that is technically possible, emotionally provocative, and deeply cinematic.
Did you know you can buy caviar with food stamps?
Did you know you can buy a private jet with social security?
Never mind that almost no one is doing these things. Never mind that you, personally, have never witnessed a single caviar-eating SNAP recipient boarding their Gulfstream courtesy of the Social Security Administration. The beauty of the absurd claim lies not in its truth, but in its suggestion.
It asks not “Is this happening?” but “What if it is?”
And in American persuasion, the hypothetical is more powerful than the factual.
Absurdity as Emotional Ammunition
Absurdity is not random; it is a weapon designed for an audience that prefers feeling over thinking. The American psyche today is over-stimulated, under-researched, and exhausted by complexity. We do not want to unpack a multi-layered policy brief; we want a scandal compressed into a sentence.
Absurdity provides that. It takes an edge-case possibility and inflates it into a moral emergency. It turns a system with millions of ordinary participants into a carnival of freeloaders, frauds, and secret elites.
You cannot simply argue that welfare needs oversight — that is boring, procedural, and sane. Instead:
One lobster tail on the government dime, and we declare a national moral collapse.
Absurdity does not persuade by proof; it persuades by provocation. If it outrages you, it has already won.
Why Absurdity Works So Well in America
Absurdity thrives here because it aligns perfectly with the modern American emotional climate:
We distrust institutions, so absurd accusations feel plausible.
We romanticize individual responsibility, so any perceived free-rider becomes a villain.
We are saturated with entertainment, so politics must shock to compete.
We treat outrage like oxygen, refreshing our sense of moral superiority.
And perhaps most importantly:
We are addicted to believing someone, somewhere, is getting away with something.
A system serving millions responsibly can be discredited by imagining — or inventing — a single flamboyant cheat.
Thus, absurdity doesn’t merely persuade. It corrodes trust, drip by absurd drip, until no institution seems legitimate and no truth seems stable.
The Technically-True Trick
Absurd persuasion lives in the liminal zone between truth and lie: the technically true. Yes, it might be possible to redeem food benefits for luxury seafood under certain bizarre conditions. Yes, if you creatively channel Social Security income into a bank and use that bank account to finance a jet, the statement becomes “not false.”
But persuasion is not judged by accuracy — it is judged by vividness.
In politics and culture wars:
A technicality becomes a headline.
A loophole becomes a lifestyle.
A bizarre edge case becomes the defining portrait of a population.
People do not process data; they process symbols. And absurdity paints symbols in neon.
From Reason to Theater
We live in what might be called the theatrical democracy. Real governance still occurs, but public perception is shaped by narrative performance. Politicians are not rewarded for thoughtful compromise; they are rewarded for spectacle. Commentators are not valued for accuracy; they are valued for virality.
To win minds, you do not need credibility — you need clicks, shock, and certainty.
And so, our public square has devolved into a contest not for truth, but for the most entertaining explanation of why everyone else is stupid, evil, or corrupt.
Absurdity is not merely tolerated — it is incentivized.
The Tragedy Behind the Joke
We pretend absurdity is funny. We treat it like satire. We share absurd “truths” and chuckle at how gullible the public must be. But here is the unfunny truth: absurd persuasion erodes the foundation of civic life.
Once we accept that the ridiculous is always lurking just beneath the bureaucratic surface, we stop believing in systems entirely.
If caviar and private jets are one loophole away, then everything must be rigged.
If one example disproves the whole system, then no system can survive.
Absurdity radicalizes cynicism.
And a cynical electorate, convinced everyone else is scamming the system, soon becomes eager to burn the system down.
The Absurd Republic
America has always loved the tall tale — the frontier exaggeration, the carnival barker, the hyperbolic sermon. But once upon a time, absurdity was a style of storytelling. Today, it is a governance strategy.
It is easier to govern a nation too amused or enraged to demand nuance.
Absurdity distracts us.
Absurdity polarizes us.
Absurdity moves ballots and raises fundraising dollars faster than facts ever could.
We pay attention to the ridiculous and ignore the reasonable.
We solve imaginary scandals while real ones fester.
We rage at phantom abuses while quiet systemic failures deepen.
In the end, absurdity is persuasive not because it is true, but because it feels true — and because it is entertaining.
And in a culture where entertainment is the ultimate currency, truth is not just optional; it is often a liability.
Epilogue: The Quiet Cost
When the absurd becomes persuasive and the plausible becomes banal, democracy does not collapse overnight — it rots slowly from the inside. Trust dissolves. Cynicism metastasizes. The electorate loses the ability to distinguish between the outrageous anecdote and the everyday reality.
And a nation that cannot agree on what is real cannot agree on what is wrong — or how to fix it.
Absurdity wins,
but the country loses.
Not with a bang,
but with a laugh track.
The Inner Monologue 
Leave a comment