The Inner Monologue

---

In the mythology of technology—our modern religion of progress—there is a sacred assumption:
What is invented shall stay invented.

Once humanity discovers concrete, or steel, or astronomical computing, or programmatic logic, we imagine it lives forever in the vault of civilization. We imagine libraries, servers, and standards bodies as eternal bulwarks against amnesia. We imagine progress like a ladder or a rocket: each rung ascends to a higher rung, each breakthrough an irreversible step toward a smarter future.

But ladders rot.
Rockets fall.
Civilizations forget.

The truth is far more cyclical, and far less comfortable: Technology can rise to maturity and then decay into oblivion, leaving no trace but artifacts and legends. And just as importantly, it can be rediscovered again, as if for the first time.

The Technology Readiness Level—the sacred nine-step staircase of NASA and DARPA—ends at “deployed, proven, widespread.” It assumes permanence. It assumes that once we reach the top, the machine will run forever.

History mocks that arrogance.

The Loop, Not the Ladder

Picture instead a loop. At one point, fledgling technologies wobble like newborn foals—fragile, uncertain, experimental. They grow, strengthen, mature, become ubiquitous, invisible, assumed permanent. That is the upward half.

Then the downward begins.

First, expertise narrows.
Then suppliers dwindle.
Then apprenticeship dies.
Then a technology becomes quaint, then niche, then forgotten.
Then, finally, lost.

And at the bottom—zero—there is silence.
The place where the last practitioner dies.
The last workshop closes.
The knowledge evaporates, not because it was wrong but because no one remembered why it mattered.

After that, if humanity is lucky—if curiosity remains, if records survive, if ruins whisper and fragments provoke wonder—the cycle restarts.

We “invent” again.
Except we don’t invent—we remember.

Our Ignorance Wearing a Crown

We moderns congratulate ourselves for being clever, for crowdsourcing wisdom and archiving genomes and uploading cultural memory to silicon temples. But we also forget faster than ever. We allow skills to evaporate the moment a machine performs them better. We celebrate abstraction without honoring foundation.

It is possible—indeed, likely—that future civilizations will excavate our discarded data centers and brittle glass memory wafers with the same mix of awe and confusion that we apply to Roman aqueducts or Greek mechanisms.

They will wonder how we powered things.
How we fabricated precision.
How we encoded thought.
How we survived our own cleverness.

They may marvel that we lived inside a miracle and allowed huge portions of it to slip through our fingers, because it felt mundane.

Why Things Are Forgotten

Technologies die not from failure but from confidence.

Once a thing becomes ubiquitous, nobody fears losing it.
Once nobody fears losing it, nobody protects it.
Once nobody protects it, entropy does the rest.

When people stop learning to:

hand-sharpen tools

build analog radios

forge metal

repair engines

do math without circuits

purify water without power

read maps without satellites

teach skills without algorithms

write code without models

think without automation

We are not “moving forward.”
We are trading capability for convenience.
We are outsourcing cognition to machines and memory to cloud providers and confidence to systems we no longer understand.

It works—until it doesn’t.

Then suddenly, old knowledge becomes priceless again.
And we go scavenging through museums and manuals and ruins like humbled archaeologists of our own past.

The Downward TRL: A Scale of Forgetting

If invention has nine steps upward, it should have nine steps downward:

from ubiquitous to specialized

from specialized to boutique

from boutique to hobbyist

from hobbyist to archival

from archival to illegible

from illegible to mythic

from mythic to extinct

With a moment in the middle—a zero—where the ember dies.

And then, one hopeful spark: rediscovery.
The same curiosity that once lifted us out of caves and into laboratories will lift us again.

Provided we still cultivate curiosity.
Provided we still honor memory.
Provided we still believe there is value in learning how to do something with our own minds and hands.

Civilization Is a Campfire, Not an Escalator

Fire does not sustain itself because it once burned bright.
It sustains itself because someone keeps feeding it fuel, and sweeping away ash, and tending to it with attention and skill.

Civilization is the same.
Technology is the same.
Knowledge is the same.

If left unattended, they cool.
If neglected long enough, they extinguish.

A civilization that loves convenience more than comprehension is a civilization walking backward down the TRL curve without realizing it.

A society that believes it is too advanced to forget is a society already forgetting.

The Case for an Inverse TRL

A looped TRL system would teach humility. It would acknowledge fragility. It would encode a truth most progress-narratives avoid:

The end stage of technology is not immortality.
It is disappearance.

Unless we fight entropy.
Unless we remember that innovation requires preservation as much as invention.
Unless we treat knowledge the way we treat biodiversity: as something precious, vulnerable, and irreplaceable.

Seed banks protect agriculture.
Museums protect culture.
We may soon need Technology Seed Banks—global repositories not just of files and formulas, but of know-how and craft and physical practice.

Imagine a world storing not just blueprints for turbines, but the muscle memory to build them by hand when no machine is available.

That world would survive collapse.
It might even rebuild faster.

The Future Rediscovered

Perhaps the greatest technologies humanity will “invent” in the next thousand years are technologies we previously forgot. Civilization may advance through remembering as much as through creating.

If the TRL scale is a flat staircase, we march toward cultural senility.
If the TRL scale becomes a loop, we begin to guard against forgetting.

And so the question becomes:

Will we live as custodians of knowledge, or tenants of convenience?

Because technology is not a gift of the present.
It is a legacy we are either tending—or losing.

And history has made one point brutally clear:

Nothing stays invented unless someone keeps reinventing it.

---