The Inner Monologue

Thinking Out Loud

It Is as Easy to Live a Rich Life as a Poor One— On the Incidental Pursuit of Wealth and the Meaning of Abundance

The antique cliché, “It is as easy to love a rich man as a poor man,” has long been dismissed as a cynical wink at human nature. It was a phrase born in a time when marriage was often an economic arrangement, not a romantic one, and where the comfort of silk sheets seemed to dull the moral discomfort of pragmatism. But strip the saying of its mercenary intent, recast it in a modern context, and a deeper wisdom reveals itself: It is as easy to live a rich life as a poor life.

At first, that may sound naïve — a kind of fortune-cookie optimism unmoored from the realities of class, privilege, and inequality. But the hypothesis isn’t about the wealth one possesses; it’s about the wealth one pursues. It proposes that the effort it takes to live a “poor life” — one of stagnation, bitterness, or neglect — is not much different than the effort required to live richly, with purpose and curiosity. The incidental pursuit of wealth, understood broadly as the pursuit of competence, creativity, and meaning, is itself worth the effort because it naturally enriches life whether or not it leads to material fortune.


The Myth of Difficulty

Many people speak of a “rich life” as if it were an unattainable luxury — the domain of those born into money, power, or luck. But wealth, in the truest sense, is the cumulative outcome of thousands of small, conscious acts: saving instead of spending, reading instead of scrolling, exploring instead of complaining, engaging instead of withdrawing. None of these acts are inherently harder than their opposites. They simply require awareness and intent.

In other words, the difficulty of living richly is overstated. What truly exhausts the human spirit is not striving for something better, but wallowing in something lesser. It takes energy to complain. It takes time to procrastinate. It takes years to sustain bitterness. A poor life can be every bit as laborious as a rich one — it just yields no return on investment.

The irony is that people often choose the familiar misery of mediocrity over the unfamiliar labor of self-improvement, imagining that the latter must be harder. In truth, both require effort. But only one rewards it.


The Incidental Pursuit of Wealth

Wealth, in this context, is not an accumulation of currency but an accumulation of competence. The artist pursuing mastery, the craftsman perfecting their form, the entrepreneur building something of lasting value — these individuals may or may not become financially rich, but they are almost always experientially rich. Their lives hum with purpose, with momentum, with the friction that polishes the self.

And if material wealth follows, it is often incidental, the natural byproduct of value creation. A rich life begets richness — not always in dollars, but in satisfaction, confidence, and opportunity.

This is why the pursuit itself is worth the effort. To strive toward mastery or abundance, even if it leads nowhere financially, is to live awake. It’s to engage with the world on creative terms rather than passive ones. The incidental pursuit of wealth gives structure to time, meaning to effort, and dignity to labor.


The Poverty of Neglect

The inverse of a rich life is not necessarily a poor one, but a neglected one. It’s a life allowed to drift — unexamined, unrefined, unintentional. Poverty of this kind can exist at any income level. It’s the dull comfort of routine, the quiet erosion of curiosity, the slow death of imagination.

Living poorly does not require poverty. It requires inertia. It requires the surrender of potential to convenience. A poor life is not the product of deprivation but of disconnection — from one’s own capacity to create, to learn, to aspire.

We all know people who seem perpetually stuck, who never reach for more because they’ve internalized the belief that “more” isn’t for them. And yet, the cost of reaching is often no greater than the cost of staying still. Both demand energy; only one generates growth.


The Effort Paradox

The truth is that both rich and poor lives are built from the same raw material: time, energy, and attention. Each of us receives twenty-four hours in a day. What differentiates a rich life is not the abundance of hours but the quality of engagement within them.

It takes roughly the same effort to cook a meal as to microwave one. The same drive to take a walk as to sink into the couch. The same courage to speak truth as to hide behind silence. Living richly is less about privilege than about priorities — where one directs the unavoidable expenditure of life’s effort.

The paradox is that people often expend enormous energy constructing lives they find unsatisfying, while convincing themselves that satisfaction would be too difficult to achieve. They imagine that joy, curiosity, or prosperity are luxuries rather than choices, forgetting that effort is inescapable — only its direction is optional.


Living Richly in a Poor World

None of this diminishes the reality that systemic inequities make life harder for some than for others. But even within those constraints, the hypothesis holds a defiant kind of hope: richness is not the exclusive property of the privileged. The richness of thought, of art, of love, of mastery — these are currencies that inflation cannot touch and politics cannot ration.

Living richly may begin with a decision as simple as paying attention. To beauty. To conversation. To craft. To health. To the long arc of one’s own becoming. A person can be materially poor and yet live a life so abundant in awareness, integrity, and creation that it humbles the wealthy.


Conclusion: The Worth of the Pursuit

To live richly, then, is not a matter of ease or difficulty but of direction. Both rich and poor lives require labor. The difference lies in what that labor builds. The incidental pursuit of wealth — not greed, not accumulation, but the steady cultivation of excellence — makes the human experience fuller, deeper, and more awake.

So yes, it is as easy to live a rich life as a poor one. The same effort can be spent either way. But one path compounds meaning, while the other depletes it. The incidental pursuit of wealth is worth the effort because it turns time — that most perishable of resources — into something that grows rather than fades.

In the end, a rich life is not a life of possession, but of participation. And participation, like love, costs no more for the rich than it does for the poor.

Published by

Leave a comment